<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1960 Hovercraft Lineup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/</link>
	<description>A tinkerer's journal and look at life's debris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 03:35:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.27</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-207315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-207315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice blog. I made a simple hovercraft for my 4 year old son this weekend with plywood a leaf blower and shower curtain. He learned about air pressure. Cool stuff! We found a fun site with neat science experiments like simple hovercraft directions. I will put the link below for anyone interested.

http://weirdsciencekids.com/FunExperiments.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog. I made a simple hovercraft for my 4 year old son this weekend with plywood a leaf blower and shower curtain. He learned about air pressure. Cool stuff! We found a fun site with neat science experiments like simple hovercraft directions. I will put the link below for anyone interested.</p>
<p><a href="http://weirdsciencekids.com/FunExperiments.html" rel="nofollow">http://weirdsciencekids.com/FunExperiments.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aud1073cH</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-205581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aud1073cH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-205581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was in the scouts I ordered those plans too.  I opted for the one large disk plan instead of the three small disks plumbed with PVC - even at that age I could tell that the plumbing would be a source of leaks and not distribute the air evenly.

My 4 foot plywood disk flew under the power of the motor from our discarded Electrolux vacuum cleaner. I think the skirting was the hardest part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in the scouts I ordered those plans too.  I opted for the one large disk plan instead of the three small disks plumbed with PVC &#8211; even at that age I could tell that the plumbing would be a source of leaks and not distribute the air evenly.</p>
<p>My 4 foot plywood disk flew under the power of the motor from our discarded Electrolux vacuum cleaner. I think the skirting was the hardest part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crisman</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-42729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Crisman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-42729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were there. Building hovercrafts in the late 50&#039;s and the 60&#039;s.
We had a three passenger flying hovercraft that was featured in the garage of the house of the future at the 1961 Seattle worlds fair. It was on the cover of Science &amp; Mechanics - Sept - 1961.
What really made me feel old was finding a mint condition example of the magazine at an antigue fair.

We&#039;ve been out of the spotlight for many years, but we have some new designs and we seek partners to build. See some info and designs at:
Keep on hoverin....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were there. Building hovercrafts in the late 50&#8242;s and the 60&#8242;s.<br />
We had a three passenger flying hovercraft that was featured in the garage of the house of the future at the 1961 Seattle worlds fair. It was on the cover of Science &amp; Mechanics &#8211; Sept &#8211; 1961.<br />
What really made me feel old was finding a mint condition example of the magazine at an antigue fair.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been out of the spotlight for many years, but we have some new designs and we seek partners to build. See some info and designs at:<br />
Keep on hoverin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Matta</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-40302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Matta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-40302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We built one similar to that of the Gadget Show - ours was a circular board with a leaf blower mounted toward the front.  It gave the rider something to hold on to.

Mind you, the rider was typically a youth weighing not more than about 50lbs (22.7 kilo).  The supervising adult would swing the craft around using the electrical extension cord making it a wild - but fun - ride!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We built one similar to that of the Gadget Show &#8211; ours was a circular board with a leaf blower mounted toward the front.  It gave the rider something to hold on to.</p>
<p>Mind you, the rider was typically a youth weighing not more than about 50lbs (22.7 kilo).  The supervising adult would swing the craft around using the electrical extension cord making it a wild &#8211; but fun &#8211; ride!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vwcamperman</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-38253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vwcamperman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-38253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in the UK, The Gadget show made one for a small challenge using four leaf blowers

here&#039;s a link   http://www.jasonbradbury.com/jason_bradbury/2005/10/diy_hoverboard.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in the UK, The Gadget show made one for a small challenge using four leaf blowers</p>
<p>here&#8217;s a link   <a href="http://www.jasonbradbury.com/jason_bradbury/2005/10/diy_hoverboard.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jasonbradbury.com/jason_bradbury/2005/10/diy_hoverboard.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willi</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-37591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-37591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first one looks like something from the ACME catalog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one looks like something from the ACME catalog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert H.</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-37312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-37312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My personal favorite of functional ACVs is the Aeromobile 200-2 of 1962, shown here in Japan
&lt;img src=&quot;http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v332/pygar/tokyo1_small.jpg&quot;/&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal favorite of functional ACVs is the Aeromobile 200-2 of 1962, shown here in Japan<br />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v332/pygar/tokyo1_small.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFS</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-37288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TFS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-37288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#3 is the hovercraft pimpmobile!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 is the hovercraft pimpmobile!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert H.</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-37287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-37287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup.  Number 2 is the 1959 Curtiss-Wright model 2500 &quot;Bee&quot;, (AKA &quot;Air-Car&quot;) prototype.  

http://www.aerofiles.com/ writes:

Experimental 2p passenger air-cushion hover-car, built in test form (lower photo), anticipated market in ag application and as swamp buggy; 85hp Continental with 6&#039; two-blade prop (projected multi-blade props with two 180hp Lycomings) width: 8&#039;0&quot; length: 28&#039;0&quot;. Michael Cutler et al. Total &quot;flight&quot; time in mid-July 1959 was about 25 hours, albeit only inches AGL; top speed: 35. Displayed at Fort Eustis Transportation Museum, Colonial Williamsburg VA.

C-W experimented in the field of hovercraft with high hopes that the new technology would save their moribund company, and these hopes caused them to issue news releases and drawings of the new product long before the engineering department was ready. I have seen footage of some of the test &#039;flights.&#039; First, the cars looked nothing like the drawing — that sweetheart was a marketing department dream, not reality. What they actually tested was bigger than a Ford Excursion, but still only seated two. It was a big plenum chamber with controllable shutters all along the perimeter for thrust, braking, and control. What the footage shows, however, is that the car was just barely controllable, even over smooth pavement in good weather. The noise was truly awesome, as well. To complete the dismal picture, hover height was only inches, and there was no flexible skirt — it had less off-road capability than an average sedan of the period. It was a wonderful dream, but to have spent millions on it was typical of a management team that took Curtiss from the biggest in the industry to bankruptcy.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.  Number 2 is the 1959 Curtiss-Wright model 2500 &#8220;Bee&#8221;, (AKA &#8220;Air-Car&#8221;) prototype.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.aerofiles.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aerofiles.com/</a> writes:</p>
<p>Experimental 2p passenger air-cushion hover-car, built in test form (lower photo), anticipated market in ag application and as swamp buggy; 85hp Continental with 6&#8242; two-blade prop (projected multi-blade props with two 180hp Lycomings) width: 8&#8217;0&#8243; length: 28&#8217;0&#8243;. Michael Cutler et al. Total &#8220;flight&#8221; time in mid-July 1959 was about 25 hours, albeit only inches AGL; top speed: 35. Displayed at Fort Eustis Transportation Museum, Colonial Williamsburg VA.</p>
<p>C-W experimented in the field of hovercraft with high hopes that the new technology would save their moribund company, and these hopes caused them to issue news releases and drawings of the new product long before the engineering department was ready. I have seen footage of some of the test &#8216;flights.&#8217; First, the cars looked nothing like the drawing — that sweetheart was a marketing department dream, not reality. What they actually tested was bigger than a Ford Excursion, but still only seated two. It was a big plenum chamber with controllable shutters all along the perimeter for thrust, braking, and control. What the footage shows, however, is that the car was just barely controllable, even over smooth pavement in good weather. The noise was truly awesome, as well. To complete the dismal picture, hover height was only inches, and there was no flexible skirt — it had less off-road capability than an average sedan of the period. It was a wonderful dream, but to have spent millions on it was typical of a management team that took Curtiss from the biggest in the industry to bankruptcy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob P.</title>
		<link>http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/comment-page-1/#comment-37271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.finkbuilt.com/blog/1960-hovercraft-lineup/#comment-37271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone have more info on number 2? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have more info on number 2? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
